Ruth Marcus, a Washington Post columnist, makes the case that it is the lack of political ambition that keeps women from participating more fully in our nation's political life. J. Goodrich, AlterNet contributor, addresses the issue with much and well-founded skepticism.
A provocative read.
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Do you want to climb the corporate ladder? Check out the number of women on your company's board first.
A new Catalyst study finds a correlation in corporations between women board directors and the number of women executives
NEW YORK (July 23, 2008) – There’s a new way to look into the future and predict the number of women in senior management ranks – just count the current number of women on corporate boards. That’s according to Catalyst’s Advancing Women Leaders: The Connection Between Women Board Directors and Women Corporate Officers, which found that the number of women on a company’s board is directly connected to the future number of women in its senior management ranks. This compelling predictor shows a way to increase the number of women in leadership, and further supports the findings of Catalyst’s research on the financial implications of gender diversity at the top. That analysis revealed that Fortune 500 companies with the largest representation of women board directors and corporate officers achieve, on average, higher financial performance.
Women in corporate leadership can also send a critical message to people entering the workforce. “Women leaders are role models to early- and mid-career women and, simply by being there at the top, encourage pipeline women to aspire to senior positions. They see that their skills will be valued and rewarded,” said Ilene H. Lang, President of Catalyst.
Catalyst’s latest research shows a clear and positive link between the percentage of women board directors in the past and the percentage of women corporate officers in the future:
• Companies with 30 percent women board directors in 2001 had, on average, 45 percent more women corporate officers by 2006, compared to companies with no women board members.
• Companies with the lowest percentages of women board directors in 2001 had, on average, 26 percent fewer corporate officers than those with the highest five years later.
• Companies with two or more women members on a company’s board in 2001 had 25 percent more women corporate officers by 2006 than companies with one woman board member in 2001.
Furthermore, the presence of women on boards had a stronger impact on the growth of women in line positions than in staff positions. Line experience is necessary for advancement into CEO and top leadership positions, and Catalyst’s annual Censuses show that women are historically underrepresented in these roles. This research demonstrates the important contribution that women board directors play in making sure women get this critical experience.
“A gender diverse board signals the right tone at the top and the importance that a company places on creating a successful work environment for all employees,” said Ms. Lang. “Moreover, this study shows that what’s good for women is good for business. Simply put, more women on corporate boards correlate with more women in the C-suite and better financial performance – a real win/win for companies, shareholders, and talented women seeking companies that support their advancement.”
The Chubb Corporation is the lead sponsor of Advancing Women Leaders: The Connection Between Women Board Directors and Women Corporate Officers, with contributing sponsors Citizens Communications and IBM Corporation. To learn more about this study and other research by Catalyst, please visit www.catalyst.org, or contact Serena Fong at 646-388-7757, sfong@catalyst.org, or Jeff Barth at 646-388-7725, jbarth@catalyst.org.
Thursday, July 10, 2008
Same old, same old...Some dire predictions for women's advancement in the workplace
The average 25-year-old woman who works until age 65 will earn $523,000 less over her lifetime than the average working male.
Jennifer Waldref explores the various "pillars" holding up the glass ceiling for Women's eNews, including the persistence of sexual harassment, pregnancy and motherhood bias, unequal pay for equal work and gender bias in promotions.Read more.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)